Last edited by Jugis
Tuesday, August 4, 2020 | History

5 edition of Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals found in the catalog.

Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals

by Irene Hames

  • 147 Want to read
  • 24 Currently reading

Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. in New York .
Written in English


The Physical Object
FormatElectronic resource
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL24265283M
ISBN 109780470750261

Peer Review Policy We are committed to prompt evaluation and publication of fully accepted papers in all World Scientific journals. To maintain a high-quality publication, all submissions undergo a rigorous review process. Characteristics of the peer review process are as follows. How to write a helpful peer review report Probably the most important part of the peer review process, this section digs deep into what it takes to write a peer review report, which will be helpful to the author and ultimately to science.

Featured peer reviews. Below are a few of Peerage of Science peer reviews with high PEQ-scores, featured as examples of what good but critical peer review looks like.. As the manuscripts under review are not yet published, the manuscript title and some peer review . Writing a peer review can be just as daunting as being reviewed, in this module we discuss how you can write the most effective peer review possible. We look at the importance of taking time to assess the manuscript and evaluate the abstract before you get started. initially as Publisher of the genetics journals and books, and currently.

1: Get to know the review format. At its core, a manuscript review is made up of three sections: The rating form. The editor will provide you a form for rating the manuscript on a predetermined list of attributes that will lead you to answer the central question: Do you think this journal should publish the manuscript? A note to the authors. Peer review is the principal mechanism by which the quality of research is judged. Most funding decisions in science and the academic advancement of scientists are based on peer-reviewed publications. Because the number of scientific articles published each year continues to grow, the quality of the peer-review process and the quality of the editorial board [ ].


Share this book
You might also like
manual of licensed trade stocktaking

manual of licensed trade stocktaking

Education in a free society

Education in a free society

German Commercial Code

German Commercial Code

Our sanctuary

Our sanctuary

Evolution or chaos

Evolution or chaos

Providing for the consideration of H.R. 994, the Small Business Growth and Administrative Accountability Act of 1996

Providing for the consideration of H.R. 994, the Small Business Growth and Administrative Accountability Act of 1996

principle of apartheid

principle of apartheid

Shifting Borders

Shifting Borders

Computer-ease

Computer-ease

The first ten years

The first ten years

Culture change and psychopathology: the case of Cree adolescent students in Quebec

Culture change and psychopathology: the case of Cree adolescent students in Quebec

Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals by Irene Hames Download PDF EPUB FB2

Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals is an essential reference for science journal editors, editorial office staff and publishers. It is an invaluable handbook for the set-up of new Editorial Offices, as well as a useful reference for well-established journals which may need guidance on a particular situation, or may Reviews: 4.

Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals fills this ga Until now, little information has been readily available on how this important facet of the journal publishing process should be conducted properly/5(8).

Buy a cheap copy of Peer Review and Manuscript Management in book. This comprehensive yet concise book provides a thorough and complete guide to every aspect of managing the peer review process for scientific journals.

Until now, Free shipping over $ Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals fills this gap and provides clear guidance on all aspects of peer review, from manuscript submission to final decision. Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals is an essential reference for science journal editors, editorial office staff and publishers.

Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals fills this gap and provides clear guidance on all aspects of peer review, from manuscript submission to final Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals is an essential reference for science journal editors, editorial office staff and publishers.

Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice. Katherine Kreilkamp Respiratory Care February54 (2). Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals by Irene Hames,available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide.

Get this from a library. Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals: guidelines for good practice. [Irene Hames] -- This comprehensive yet concise book provides a thorough and complete guide to every aspect of managing the peer review process for scientific journals.

Until now, little information has been readily. In one section of her book Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice, Irene Hames, PhD, current managing editor of The Plant Journal, provides essential clues that can help ensure that decision-making on reviewed manuscripts is a systematic, easy-to-follow process where mistakes should not occur.

Irene Hames Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice. Oxford, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell. pp xii,US$Paperback ISBN: Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice.

Oxford, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell; pp xii,US$Paperback ISBN "Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals is a reference for science journal editors, editorial office staff and publishers. It is a handbook for the setting up of new editorial offices, as well as a reference for well-established journals which may need guidance on a particular situation, or may want to review their current.

Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice. Oxford, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell; pp xii,US$Paperback ISBN Received 8 December Accepted 15 December Dr. Irene Hames is an independent research-publication and peer-review specialist with over 30 years' experience in scholarly publishing.

She served as specialist advisor to the UK Parliamentary House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, and helped produce the report Peer Review in Scientific Publications.

is also author of the book Peer Review and Manuscript Management. A key convention in the publication of research is the peer review process, in which the quality and potential contribution of each manuscript is evaluated by one's peers in the scientific community.

Like other scientific journals, APA journals utilize a peer review process to guide manuscript selection and publication decisions. Peer Review at Science Publications. As a peer reviewer for Science magazine, you are part of a valued community. Scientific progress depends on the communication of.

Manuscripts have been subjected to the peer review process prior to publication for over years. Currently, the peer review process is used by almost all scientific journals, and The International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy is no exception.

Scholarly publication is the means by which new work is communicated and peer review is an important part of this process.

Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals – Guidelines for Good Practice. Irene Hames. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK, co‐published with the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers (ALPSP).

March ISBN: £ This book, a compilation of nine chapters and four appendices. With the publication of Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals, Irene Hames, who has been managing editor of The Plant Journal for 16 years, has provided the first handbook that describes in detail the review and editorial process for manuscripts submitted for publication, and includes a wealth of examples of good practice.

Peer review is a positive process. Peer review is an integral part of scientific publishing that confirms the validity of the science reported. Peer reviewers are experts who volunteer their time to help improve the journal manuscripts they review—they offer authors free advice.

Through the peer-review process, manuscripts should become. How to perform a peer review. You’ve received or accepted an invitation to review an article.

Now the work begins. Here are some guidelines and a step by step guide to help you conduct your peer review. General and Ethical Guidelines. Step by Step Guide to Reviewing a Manuscript. Top Tips for Peer Reviewers. Working with Editors. Reviewing.Peer review is defined as the “critical assessment of manuscripts submitted to journals by experts who are not part of the editorial staff.” Ninety-one percent of authors think that peer review improved the quality of their article (Sense About Science Peer Review Survey).Scholarly peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of subjecting an author's scholarly work, research, or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field, before a paper describing this work is published in a journal, conference proceedings or as a book.

The peer review helps the publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief, the editorial board or .